I have been doing a lot of interviews at work lately and I think these would have been really helpful. It will also be helpful for when I eventually have to look for another job. Since this page is the most popular page on my blog, I figured I might as well post questions found on the linked-to page above in case that blog ever goes down. Tell me about yourself:
Lying, as defined by St. Thomas Aquinasis a statement at variance with the mind. This definition is more accurate than most others which are current.
Thus a recent authority defines Common lie told lie as a false statement made with the intention of deceiving. But it is possible to lie without making a false statement and without any intention of deceiving.
ThomasCatholic divines and ethical writers commonly make a distinction between 1 injurious, or hurtful, 2 officious, and 3 jocose lies.
Jocose lies are told for the purpose of affording amusement. Of course what is said merely and obviously in joke cannot be a lie: An officious, or white, lie is such that it does nobody any injury: An injurious lie is one which does harm. It has always been admitted that Common lie told question of lying creates great difficulties for the moralist.
From the dawn of ethical speculation there have been two different opinions on the question as to whether lying is ever permissible. Aristotlein his Ethics, seems to hold that it is never allowable to tell a lie, while Platoin his Republic, is more accommodating; he allows doctors and statesmen to lie occasionally for the good of their patients and for the common weal.
Modern philosophers are divided in the same way. Kant allowed a lie under no circumstance. Paulsen and most modern non-Catholic writers admit the lawfulness of the lie of necessity.
Indeed the pragmatic tendency of the day, which denies that there is such a thing as absolute truthand measures the morality of actions by their effect on society and on the individual, would seem to open wide the gates to all but injurious lies.
But even on the ground of pragmatism it is well for us to bear in mind that white lies are apt to prepare the way for others of a darker hue. There is some difference of opinion among the Fathers of the Christian Church. Origen quotes Plato and approves of his doctrine on this point Stromata, VI.
He says that a man who is under the necessity of lying should diligently consider the matter so as not to exceed. He should gulp the lie as a sick man does his medicine. He should be guided by the example of Judith, Esther, and Jacob.
If he exceed, he will be judged the enemy of Him who said, "I am the Truth. John Chrysostom held that it is lawful to deceive others for their benefit, and Cassian taught that we may sometimes lie as we take medicine, driven to it by sheer necessity. Augustinehowever, took the opposite side, and wrote two short treatises to prove that it is never lawful to tell a lie.
His doctrine on this point has generally been followed in the Western Churchand it has been defended as the common opinion by the Schoolmen and by modern divines.
It rests in the first place on Holy Scripture. In places almost innumerable Holy Scripture seems to condemn lying as absolutely and unreservedly as it condemns murder and fornication.
Innocent III gives expression in one of his decretals to this interpretation, when he says that Holy Scripture forbids us to lie even to save a man's life. If, then, we allow the lie of necessity, there seems to be no reason from the theological point of view for not allowing occasional murder and fornication when these crimes would procure great temporal advantage; the absolute character of the moral law will be undermined, it will be reduced to a matter of mere expediency.
The chief argument from reason which St. Thomas and other theologians have used to prove their doctrine is drawn from the nature of truth. Lying is opposed to the virtue of truth or veracity.
Truth consists in a correspondence between the thing signified and the signification of it. Man has the power as a reasonable and social being of manifesting his thoughts to his fellow-men.
Right order demands that in doing this he should be truthful. If the external manifestation is at variance with the inward thought, the result is a want of right order, a monstrosity in nature, a machine which is out of gear, whose parts do not work together harmoniously.
As we are dealing with something which belongs to the moral order and with virtue, the want of right order, which is of the essence of a lie, has a special moral turpitude of its own.People hate change. We may sit around and wish our lives were different, but when the rubber really starts streaking the tarmac, we usually find ourselves wishing we could just hang out .
A CareerBuilder survey says 56% of HR managers have caught job candidates in a lie on their resumes. May Adults lie constantly to kids.
I'm not saying we should stop, but I think we should at least examine which lies we tell and why. There may also be a benefit to us. You lack an understanding of what the hypothesis of evolution is.
Race is an intra-species (if there was ever a “change” in a common ancestor which I do not believe) change, thus not “evolution”. The hypothesis of evolution attempts to say one species can change into another species.
In the #commoncore Project, authors Jonathan Supovitz, Alan Daly, Miguel del Fresno and Christian Kolouch examine the intense debate surrounding the Common Core State Standards education reform as it played out on Twitter. I try to trick people to be honest in their interview, if people are just feeding me rehearsed answers or answers they were told to say, that does not tell me anything about how they will actually perform in the job, some people are great at interviews but poor workers.